Two healthcare professionals look at a tablet

ECCO₂R: Advancing Lung-Protective Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) can help manage hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) who require invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). By removing CO₂ directly from the bloodstream, ECCO₂R supports the achievement of guideline-recommended lung-protective ventilation (LPV) strategies.


The burden of ARF and risks of IMV

ARF affects more than half of ICU patients and is often caused by acute respiratory disease syndrome (ARDS), pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular complications or sepsis.¹⁻⁶

ARDS carries high mortality; even mild cases of ARDS carry a substantial mortality risk of 35%.⁴⁻⁷

IMV is often essential when spontaneous breathing fails, but traditional high mechanical power ventilation can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), which is associated with increased morbidity, multi-organ dysfunction and higher mortality risk.8-17

ARF and IMV in the ICU

A large national study examined trends in ARF hospitalizations, treatments and outcomes over nearly a decade, showing increased use of noninvasive ventilation and improvements in survival.

High mechanical power and outcomes

A multicenter trial found that using lower tidal volumes for patients with acute lung injury and ARDS significantly reduced mortality and increased ventilator-free days compared to high mechanical power ventilation.


Clinical guidelines support lung-protective strategies

To improve survival, guidelines recommend LPV strategies, including low tidal volume (~6 mL/kg PBW), controlled plateau pressure and higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to reduce VILI risk.18-22 

Compared to traditional IMV, LPV is associated with:

  • Reduced mortality13,16,23-25
  • More ventilator-free days16
  • Fewer days with non-pulmonary organ failure16
  • Improved weaning outcomes and reduced hospital stays16,25

Yet, up to one-third of ARDS patients on LPV still show signs of tidal hyperinflation and VILI.26

Two healthcare professionals discuss data on a tablet device

ARDS management guidelines

See how the 2017 ATS/ESICM recommendations support lung-protective strategies and why ECCO₂R is gaining clinical interest.


LPV can cause hypercapnia and acidosis

While LPV reduces lung stress, it can impair CO₂ clearance. This leads to hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis, which:

  • Are more frequent and prolonged with LPV than traditional ventilation16,27,28
  • Are associated with significantly increased ICU and in-hospital mortality29-31
  • May become a barrier to effective LPV implementation, especially in patients with cardiovascular or renal risk18,19,32

How ECCO₂R supports protective ventilation

ECCO₂R is an extracorporeal therapy that removes CO₂ from the blood, helping to facilitate LPV or ultra-protective LPV (UPLV) while avoiding the complications of hypercapnia and acidosis.33-35

  • Shown to effectively control hypercapnia in ARDS, including COVID-19-associated ARDS36-42
  • Enables LPV and UPLV in moderate ARDS, demonstrating improved survival (day 60 survival: 63.4% with LPV + ECCO₂R vs. 57.1% with IMV alone)41

Patient-centered ICU advantages

In patients likely to benefit, ECCO₂R offers additional advantages:

  • Customizable LPV/UPLV support depending on individual patient factors like dead space and lung elastance43
  • Mortality benefit may be more pronounced in patients with worse CO₂ exchange (VR ≥3) and less severe hypoxemia (PaO₂:FiO₂ ≥110 mm Hg)34
  • Compatible anticoagulation targets similar to those used in RRT circuits may ease ICU integration38

Vantive is a trademark of Vantive Health LLC.

References
  1. Vincent JL Akca S, Mendonca A, et al. The epidemiology of acute respiratory failure in critically ill patients. Chest. 2002;121:1602–1607.

  2. Wilson ME, Barwise A, Heise KJ, et al. Long-term return to functional baseline after mechanical ventilation in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(4):562–569.

  3. Vallabhajosyula S, et al. Ann Int Care. 2019;9:1–10.

  4. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315(8):788-800.

  5. Mirabile VS, Shebl E, Sankari A, et al. StatPearls. Respiratory Failure in Adults. January 2025. Accessed April 2025. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK526127/

  6. Stefan MS, Shieh MS, Pekow PS, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of acute respiratory failure in the United States, 2001 to 2009: a national survey. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(2):76-82.

  7. Wang CY, Calfee CS, Paul DW, et al. One-year mortality and predictors of death among hospital survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(3):388-396.

  8. Slutsky A. History of mechanical ventilation. From Vesalius to ventilator-induced lung injury. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2015;191:1106-1115.

  9. Gattinoni L, Protti A. Ventilation in the prone position: for some but not for all? CMAJ. 2008;178:1174-1176.

  10. Dreyfuss D, Saumon G. Ventilator-induced lung injury: lessons from experimental studies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157(1):294-323.

  11. Tremblay L, Valenza F, Ribeiro SP, Li J, Slutsky AS. Injurious ventilatory strategies increase cytokines and c-fos m-RNA expression in an isolated rat lung model. J Clin Invest. 1997;99(5):944-52.

  12. Brodie D, Slutsky AS, Combes AExtracorporeal life support for adults with respiratory failure and related indications: a review. JAMA. 2019;322(6):557-568.

  13. Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA, et al. Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012;308(16):1651-1659.

  14. Piriyapatsom A, Trisukhonth A, Chintabanyat O, et al. Adherence to lung protective mechanical ventilation in patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit and the associated increased mortality. Heliyon. 2024;10:e26220.

  15. Gorman EA, O'Kane CM, McAuley DF. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: diagnosis, outcomes, long-term sequelae, and management. Lancet. 2022;400:1157-1170.

  16. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. NEJM. 2000;342:1301-1308.

  17. Biehl M, Kashiouris MG, Gajic O. Ventilator-induced lung injury: minimizing its impact in patients with or at risk for ARDS. Respir Care. 2013;58(6):927-937.

  18. Grasselli G, Calfee CS, Camporota L, et al. ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49(7):727-759.

  19. Papazian L, Aubron C, Brochard L, et al. Formal guidelines: management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9(1):69.

  20. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304-377.

  21. Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):747-755.

  22. Abrams D, Agerstrand C, Beitler JR, et al. Risks and benefits of ultra-lung-protective invasive mechanical ventilation strategies with a focus on extracorporeal support. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;205(8):873-882.

  23. Putensen C, Theuerkauf N, Zinserling J, Wrigge H, Pelosi P. Meta-analysis: ventilation strategies and outcomes of the acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(8):566-576.

  24. Petrucci N, De Feo C. Lung protective ventilation strategy for the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(2):CD003844.

  25. Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, et al. Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(6):347-354.

  26. Terragni PP, Rosboch G, Tealdi A, et al. Tidal hyperinflation during low tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175(2):160-166.

  27. Taccone FS, Malfertheiner MV, Ferrari F, et al. Extracorporeal CO2 removal in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017;83(7):762-772.

  28. Stewart T, Meade M, Cook D et al. et al. Evaluation of a ventilation strategy to prevent barotrauma in patients at high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome. NEJM. 1998;338:355-361.

  29. Nin N, Muriel A, Peñuelas O, et al. Severe hypercapnia and outcome of mechanically ventilated patients with moderate or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(2):200-208.

  30. Tiruvoipati R, Pilcher D, Buscher H, Botha J, Bailey M. Effects of hypercapnia and hypercapnic acidosis on hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(7):e649-e656.

  31. Tiruvoipati R, Serpa Neto A, Young M, et al. An exploratory analysis of the association between hypercapnia and hospital mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022;19(2):245-254.

  32. GOLD 2021 Report. 2021. Accessed Jan 2024. https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GOLD-REPORT-2021-v1.1-25Nov20_WMV.pdf

  33. Combes A, Auzinger G, Camporota L, et al. Expert perspectives on ECCO2R for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: consensus of a 2022 European roundtable meeting. Ann Int Care. 2024;14:132.

  34. Dianti J, McNamee JJ, Slutsky AS, et al. Determinants of effect of extracorporeal CO2 removal in hypoxemic respiratory failure. NEJM Evid. 2023;2(5):EVIDoa2200295.

  35. Ferrer Gomez C, et al. J Pers Med. 2023;3:1081.

  36. Winiszewski H, Aptel F, Belon F, et al. Daily use of extracorporeal CO2 removal in a critical care unit: indications and results. J Intensive Care. 2018;6:36.

  37. Combes A, Fanelli V, Pham T, et al. Feasibility and safety of extracorporeal CO2 removal to enhance protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: the SUPERNOVA study. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:592–600.

  38. Tiruvoipati R, Ludski J, Gupta S, et al. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in the critically ill using the PrismaLung+ device. Eur J Med Res. 2023;28(1):291.

  39. Robba C, Ball L, Battaglini D, et al. Early effects of ventilatory rescue therapies on systemic and cerebral oxygenation in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2021;25:111.

  40. Alessandri F, Tonetti T, Pistidda L, et al. Extracorporeal CO 2 removal during renal replacement therapy to allow lung-protective ventilation in patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. ASAIO J. 2023;69(1):36-42.

  41. Ding X, Chen H, Zhao H, et al. ECCO2R in 12 COVID-19 ARDS patients with extremely low compliance and refractory hypercapnia. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:654658.

  42. Husain-Syed F, Birk HW, Wilhelm J, et al. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal using a renal replacement therapy platform to enhance lung-protective ventilation in hypercapnic patients with coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:598379.

  43. Goligher EC, Amato MBP, Slutsky AS. Applying precision medicine to trial design using physiology. Extracorporeal CO2 removal for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(5):558-568.